Entries Tagged 'Interviews' ↓

Interview with Bobby-Sanjay Part-2

Q: As far as our Malayalam cinema is concerned, majority of the directors take films based on other writers’ script. But in Tamil industry, the directors are coming up with their own script. In your opinion, can a director with his own script shapes up a better movie? or a director-writer combo can help in polishing the entire movie due to the team effort?

A: I cannot say a specific answer that director with his own script may be better than director-writer combo or vice versa. It purely depends. For example Alfred Hitchcock is a world famous director who never wrote script for his films, all his films were made on other writers’ scripts. Another one is Roman Polanski, who made fantastic films like China Town based on others’ scripts. As you mentioned the case of Tamil directors, there are many directors in malayalam who write their own scripts.

Bharathan, Sethu Madhavan, I V Sasi, Joshi etc made excellent films on others scripts. In this generation, Roshan Andrews, Lal Jose etc work on others’ script but Blessy directs with his own script. If there are good films in Tamil with directors’ script, there are many world classics based on director-writer combo. So we cannot say that a director with his own script is a better practice over the other. On considering my case, Roshan and I have almost identical mentality. When our ideas get exchanged, it provides more output. Then why should we give up such a team.

Q: Do you have a plan to direct a film in future?

A: Script writing and direction are different faculties. So if there comes a question whether a script writer can become a director, I cannot answer it now. Right now I am not having a dream of becoming a director. I think I need some more improvement in this faculty(writing). I will try direction only when I feel that I cannot stay away from it anymore. Sometimes it may happen in future.

Q: What about your tele serial Avicharitham- a 40 episode serial came in Asianet with your father played the lead role and handled a sensitive subject like extra marital affair and it won the state award for best script. Notebook also handled a sensitive subject like teenage pregnancy. Both the projects were handled well without losing its soul and both these works gave a message to the society. Is the selection of these sensitive subjects intentional?

A: There is no intentional thoughts that my films must handle only sensitive subjects. But I usually get attracted by the stories which people fear to tell. So there are many such stories which have a chance to be made into a serial or cinema. I cannot say that its courage to shape-up movies with such untold subjects. In my opinion, there is no need to hesitate to tell such sensitive stories. Extra marital affairs are becoming very common in the cosmo politan culture, where husbands and wives become unsatisfied in a family. I am not mentioning the physical pleasure. The most important is the unity and satisfaction of minds. Physical pleasures and its importance are in a very much exaggerated form in our society. In Avicharitham, the lead character Aravinda menon’s wife is not ready to share his articles or creativity. That makes him to get attracted to another woman who can creatively criticize his works. I decided to do this serial only because we got a promise from Asianet that it can be ended in 40 episodes. Otherwise I wouldn’t have done a mega serial.

Q: Was there any suggestions or opinion from your father for Avicharitham’s story?

A: Actually there was no suggestions from him for the story development. But he was very keen in his character’s journey in the serial. He would indicate doubts in some situations about some dialogs, and it demanded a lot of explanations for the situations.

Q: Then, your new project is Casanova, again teaming up with director Roshan and Mohanlal in the lead. What is the theme of it? Can you please give a one liner about it.

A: Actually Casanova is a man who lived in Italy long time ago. It is not sure whether he is only a fictitious character. Casanova was a man who won the love of almost 120 women in his life. Casanova is a symbol of love and romance. The Casanovas are there in all the times. We can identify many Casanovas among our society. So our new movie is about such a person who loved and won the love of many women. More than a love story, it will be a story of love. The shooting may start after mid 2008.

Q: Why did you choose Mohanlal for Casanova’s lead role? Do his character has more importance than the story?

A: He is the best actor in India. When the character Casanova is born, we thought he would be the most suitable actor for it. We think that he can handle the role much better than any other actor. As a film maker, I would like to create a film which I love to watch it in theater. I assess the story development as a viewer first. I can write a scene only which i like to see it on screen. So a film becomes successful and gives biggest satisfaction when my taste and the viewers taste meet. I can say that the lead character of Casanova is not a super human. But he is a person who attracted many women. For normal people like us, its very difficult to attract atleast a single woman in our life. So Casanova has something special in his personality to attract that much women.The film’s story and Mohanlal’s character will have equal importance.

Q: Earlier, I heard that there was a movie planned by Roshan-Suresh Gopi team named Womaniser. It didn’t happen. Is Casanova the same project.

A: No no. That was entirely a different story. That has no connection with Casanova. Actually Womaniser was only a temporary name for that Roshan project.

Q: Your previous film was with Roshan Andrews. Now the upcoming two films are also with Roshan. Do you feel that he is the best director whom you can work with and has a better chemistry?

A: I was very comfortable in working with Siby Malayil. And it was a good experience to work with him. As I told earlier, we had worked together as Kamal sir’s assistants. More than as a director, he is a very good friend of mine. We used to discuss all the matters which are related and non-related to cinema. And it is very nice and comfortable to work with a close friend. Both of us have the freedom to tell anything openly. When I suggest a scene, and if it is not upto mark, then he can instantly tell that its a boring one. And me too have that freedom. This freedom can make the work more smooth and comfortable.

Q: In malayalam industry, movies with young actors in the lead are not frequent. Notebook had entirely new faces. When will you do another youth film with the young stars of Malayalam?

A: Youngsters films are inevitable for our industry. I would say that its the fault/disability of the film makers of malayalam including me, that movies of young generation are not getting made frequently. First we have to develop or reach to a youngsters story and we should be sure that the particular story suits the young actors. There is no point in making a youngsters movie without a suitable story for it. Majority of the young actors in malayalam are really talented. They have to get utilized well. Youngsters project will be there in the near future, and we are in search for such a story.

Q: Do you think that the young actors are not getting utilised well by the film makers?

A: Exactly.They are not getting the characters that demands their full caliber. Mammootty and Mohanlal got powerful characters in the starting time of their career and they got the opportunity to work with class film makers. Mammooty’s popular films “Thrishna”, “Koodevide” etc are good examples. But today’s young actors are not getting that opportunity. They can do only the characters which they get. There is not happening a sincere effort from the film makers to utilize these youngsters’ skills.

Q: There is an unanswered question in Notebook. Who wrote that letter to Saira?

A: (Laughs). I am not ready to reveal that suspense. If I reveal it, that will be a betrayal towards that cinema. The answer is there in the movie itself and you can find it if you watch the movie closely. If one says its written by Suraj, that interpretation is true. If another man feels that its written by Suresh Gopi or Seetha, that is also true. Its upto the audience to find a solution for themselves.

Q: The number of private TV channels have increased a lot in this decade. Do you think that these channels and the mega serial culture have kept away the audience from the theater?

A: I know that when the serial “Sthree” was a hit, the attendance of first shows were affected. But even if a serial is so much good, and there is a film like Classmates in theater, its first shows will not be affected. Now the living standards of people are improved a lot. Majority of them are not ready to watch a film in a C-class theater which does not have AC or DTS. Even common people are expecting that the theater’s seats should be good, projection must be good, sound system should be good and many more. This is also a major factor in deserting the C-class and B-class theaters.

Q: Can you please describe your writing procedure of the script.

A: First of all the story discussion will take place after getting the main thread. This part is very important. My ideas and director’s ideas get exchanged and we develop the scene-order. In this discussion, the plot gets a full form and we fixes the scene order. That time I make some rough notes. But the rough notes are not necessary. Casanova is having 60 scenes. Without referring anything, I can memorize all these 60 scenes right now. So when the scene-order is complete and fixed, I starts writing scenes from the beginning. It include the dialogs also. I write a scene, by speaking the dialogs myself and self analyses the dialogs whether it suits the mood and situation. After writing the particular scene, I re-write it by omitting and adding some points. Then writes that scene once more. In total, I write a scene three times. The same procedure will be followed for all the scenes in the scene-order. If I feel a scene is boring while writing it, I stops/give up that scene right there and tries for another one, may be written only after discussing with the director. All writers are not having identical methods, there will be changes in the procedure.

Q: Which is your next movie after Casanova? Is it a Mammootty project?

A:
Ya, my next film has Mammootty in the lead. The director is Roshan himself. This film will be a thriller. I cannot reveal more about the film now.

Q: Now the other language films are invading Kerala. More Hindi films re becoming successful here, so as Tamil too. More Telugu dubbed movies are coming in. Do you believe that this invasion will be a threat to our movies?

A: In my opinion, we must take this as a challenge. Taare Zameen Par is a super hit here. People are going for these films because it gives more quality than our current movies. Our commercial cinema must improve to compete with movies like Taare Zameen Par . On that occasion, we cannot say that other language films are a threat.

Q: What about your family.

A: Bobby is my elder brother. He is married and settled in Bangalore. I have a younger sister too. She is also married and in Singapore. I am settled here with my wife(Kowdiyar, Trivandrum). She is working in Radio Mirchi. Actually my parent family is in Kottayam.

Nik: Thanks a lot sir, for sharing your views and points and allowing an interview for a non-professional like me. Best wishes for your future projects.

Interview with Bobby-Sanjay part 1

I have got an opportunity to take an interview of script writer Sanjay who is one of the most promising young writers in Malayalam cinema. He started his career along with his brother Bobby by scripting a TV serial named Avasthantharangal which was directed by Jude Attipetti. Which won the state awards including best serial, screenplay, director etc. Afterwards, Bobby Sanjay team wrote scripts for movies like Ente Veedu Appoontem and Notebook. Now Bobby Sanjay duo is doing the script work of their new film Casanova, which will be directed by Roshan Andrews with Mohanlal in the lead.

Q: Sir, How did you get into the writing field? Can you please explain the way you started this career.

A: As most of you know my father Prem Prakash is a producer/actor. It was in 1978 when I was just 4 years old, that i got to see a film’s shooting for the first time in my life. The film was Peruvazhiyambalam directed by Padmarajan and my father as its producer. After some years, I got a chance to be there as a full time member in a film’s set, as it was my summer vacation time. The film was Koodevide which was also produced by my father and directed by Padmarajan sir. It was a new information for me that apart from the stars whom we see on the screen, there are people working behind a cinema. It was only then that i got to know that the actors speak the dialogs only which are written in the script. As a boy, I related the script to comics in which the characters speak the written dialogs. In that film’s set, I got an opportunity to read some parts of its script, which was written by Padmarajan sir and it had fascinated me a lot.

During that days, cinema became an ambition for me. I had never dreamt of becoming a doctor or engineer during my school days. All during my time of education, the only dream was cinema. After my post graduation, i joined as an assistant director with director Kamal sir. Ayal Katha Ezhuthukayanu was the first film which i assisted him. It was Shri Sreenivasan who was the script writer of that movie. It was my duty to take fair copies of the script which he writes. Through that I got to learn how a writer creates scenes and dialogs. After that film, Kamal sir’s next project was Niram. Through these two films I got a deep insight in how a cinema is getting made from its pre-production work till it reaches the screen. During my days as an assistant director, i never thought of becoming a director. It was all the screenplay writing which i was fond of.

After Niram’s work, I tried to write scripts as my own and wrote around five complete scripts. But none of it got a chance to get converted into a cinema. That time, my father was about to produce a tele-serial named Avasthantharangal based on a short story by N. Mohanan. I got the responsibility of writing its screenplay, and worked it along with my brother Bobby. After telecasting the second episode of Avasthantharangal, I got a call from director Siby Malayil to have a discussion of a new movie. That’s how we got into the project Ente Veedu Appoontem.

Q: How did you get the main thread of Ente Veedu Appoontem? Have any real life incident influenced you in developing such a story?

A: Its a common thing happening in almost every family that the elder child may feel some kind of rivalry towards the younger child. I had felt that emotion a lot in my childhood days. When I suggested this theme, it was completely acceptable for Siby sir. For the sake of the movie, we had added lot more factors and incidents to depict the depth of this rivalry factor. Actually no such real life incident had influenced me in the story formation.

Q: Then, your second film was Notebook. Why did you choose a story of three teenage girls?

A: Actually there was a real incident which had influenced me in choosing the story of Notebook. A boy and a girl studying n the same school happened to have a physical relation. When the school authority came to know about this, they dismissed both the students from the school. I know both the boy and the girl personally. And I know the case of a girl who was studying in a famous school in Trivandrum got pregnant in a teenage affair. More details were added for the movie. And I think there are many such incidents which our society hesitate to have an open discussion. I felt the root cause and effects of this teenage affairs should get relevant discussion among the public.

Q: How much effective was the involvement of director Roshan Andrews in the discussion and development of Notebook’s script?

A: Actually I have no words to describe it. It was an amazing combination with him to have the story discussion and script development of Notebook. Earlier, we had worked together as assistants of Kamal. When I describe a situation, what he replies would be its visuals. That feed back can inspire me a lot. If a writer is not getting necessary feed backs from the director during the script development, it will become a script writer’s movie which may not have a soul. Actually a cinema is always a director’s cinema and it should be.

Q: One of the most catching factors in Notebook was its opening scene and the ending scene which were symbolic and almost similar in nature. Why did you choose such a pattern for the opening and ending scenes?

A: It was purely intentional. We had a plan to depict the main theme of the film in the opening scene itself . That is, the friendship among three girls and a problem that happens among them. Jumping over the fence was meant for overcoming the life’s difficulties. Saira and Pooja jumps the fence easily. But Sreedevi couldn’t jump over it easily. She was having many fences in her life. Its Saira and Pooja who inspire her to jump over her life’s hurdles. Similarly, it was Pooja who was facing a hurdle in her life at the end of the movie, and Saira and Sreedevi inspires her to overcome that. The plant which they plant in the night has an aim to become Sreedevi in the end. A symbolism was brought for showing that there is no death for friendship. But unfortunately I witnessed a lot of booing for the opening scene in theater.

Nik: But when I watched Notebook after the first week, there was not much problem for the audience in the opening scene. Three girls escape from a prayer and runs for doing something special. People expects something cunning, like whether they may be going to have some celebration or something like that. But they made a risky escape for planting a tree. It might have created a good anticipation and feeling about the movie’s treatment at-least among a few number of viewers.

San: But in the opening days majority of the people couldn’t digest the opening scene. As Nikhil pointed out, people had their own expectations while watching the opening scene. If that girls had taken out a beer bottle after reaching a safe place, there might have been claps, or if the had met their boy friends and there started a song sequence, it might have
been applauded among the mass. But I think the concept of planting a tree had created confusion among the mass.